The fluctuations between measuring equipment lamps and the norm have been known for a long time. For example an analysis carried out in 2009 by the Fraunhofer institute for solar energy systems (ISE)[1] in cooperation with major German cell manufacturers and suppliers of measuring technologies brought the physical causes of incorrect measurements in cell and module manufacture to light, hereby naming the Spectral Mismatch as a critical factor[2].
The industry is well advised to take the topic of Spectral Mismatch seriously, as becomes evident in the example of selective emitter etching. This young technology which has already roused considerable interest among cell producers, achieves promising efficiency gains of up to 0.8% in the light spectrum under 450 nm. As standard measuring equipment can hardly stimulate the solar cell in this range, efficiency gains remain practically negligible.
If cell manufacturers are not aware of the technical limits of their measuring equipment, this can be fatal. Process engineers must then assume that the "lost" efficiency increase is due to a lacking passivation of the selectively etched emitter layer because in particular the electron-hole pairs generated by short-wave light in the emitter have the tendency to recombine very quickly, and thus require a reliable passivation. This is controlled by the thickness of the silicon nitride layer (SiN layer). This means that the thickness of this layer is adapted to achieve a maximum short circuit current - subject to the measuring equipment used. However, a very recent, as yet unpublished joint research project carried out by the University of Konstanz and the Schmid Group who have been studying the effects of the Spectral Mismatch in actual practice, shows that the improvement achieved in this way under artificial sunlight constitutes a worsening of the measurements taken under normed sunlight.
Dr. Helge Haverkamp, research director in the Photovoltaic sector of the Schmid Group and Dr. Christian Buchner, director of the Schmid Group's CELL business sector, are now focusing on passing this information on to cell manufacturers: ideally the efficiency of the measuring equipment should be improved in the range of under 450 nm down to far into the ultraviolet range, which currently involves very high costs. They strongly recommend that cell manufacturers who choose to continue to use standard equipment until these high prices are reduced, take a close look at the weakness of their measuring equipment and do not fail to have reference cells measured in a calibration laboratory.
As "best practice" Dr Buchner mentions the introduction of Schmid technologies for the production of cells with the selective emitter in a combined printing and etching process (see box) at Sunrise Global Energy (Taiwan)[3]. With the easily integrable Schmid equipment, Sunrise is successfully producing high-efficiency cells in a 60 MW line and has already ordered further equipment for the second half of 2011. The efficiency increase achieved by Sunrise and the high-level reduction of production costs were however only possible because the cell manufacturer invested specifically in their measuring equipment and ensures this is consistently and correctly calibrated.
The effects of Spectral Mismatch applicable to the technology of selective emitter etching, apply in a similar way to the improvements achieved through dielectrically passivated and reflected rear sides, which promise a higher output of the upper range of the sun spectrum and do not stop at module production either. With their processes in module production, the Schmid Group shows that only consistent calibration and the use of suitable standard materials for encapsulation ensure the efficiency gains of the selective emitter, also in the module.
Because manufacturers of solar cells and modules do not want to forfeit these very promising new technologies, we can now hope that in the mass production of both products, not only further improvements but also new, normed sunlight will soon shine.
[1] Fraunhofer institute for solar energy systems ISE, www.ise.fraunhofer.de
[2] Warta, W. et al (2009). Precise Measurement of Solar Cell Performance in Production. Presentation at the PVSEC in Hamburg.
[3] www.sunriseglobalsolar.com