On 25 June 2018, the EU Directive 2018/822 on the automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation with respect to notifiable cross-border transactions came into force. This directive serves to detect aggressive tax arrangements and must be transposed into national law by the EU Member States by 31 December 2019 at the latest.
In Germany, a draft law is currently under discussion which provides not only for the reporting obligation for cross-border but also for purely domestic tax arrangements. According to the content of this draft bill, for example, the targeted acquisition of loss-making companies, certain cross-border payments between associated companies, arrangements bypassing the regulations on the automatic exchange of information and also arrangements with legally or economically opaque ownership relationships are defined as transactions subject to reporting requirements.
Tax evasion through the use of letterbox companies
In this respect, further tightening of the legal situation is to be expected, which is in line with, for example, the current criminal sanctioning of the use of so-called letterbox companies. According to Art. 370 of the German Tax Code (Abgabenordnung), anyone who reduces taxes or obtains unjustified tax advantages by using a third country company over which he or she can directly or indirectly exercise a controlling or determining influence, alone or together with related parties, for the purpose of concealing significant tax facts, is punishable by imprisonment for up to 10 years.
Tax distinction for foreign family foundations
A review of investments in what are termed foreign family foundations is again also gaining in importance in this context. Pursuant to Art. 15 of the Foreign Tax Act (Aussensteuergesetz), the assets and income of a family foundation which has its management and registered office outside the Federal Republic of Germany are attributed to the founder or the persons entitled to receive or accumulate income, and are subject to income taxation in Germany (transparent family foundation). Such an allocation of assets and income for tax purposes is only waived if, among other things, it is proven that the founder or the persons entitled to receive or accumulate income (Art. 15 (6) of the Foreign Tax Act - opaque family foundation) are legally and actually deprived of the power to dispose of the foundation’s assets. When using a transparent family foundation, the German tax authorities also regularly assume deliberately punishable conduct, since it must at least be obvious to any taxpayer that the use of such a tax structure may very well have an impact on domestic taxation.
The examination of such family foundations and cross-border arrangements under Liechtenstein law are part of the daily work of ECOVIS colleagues from Liechtenstein and Germany.
Authors:
Alexander Littich LL.M., lawyer, tax lawyer, specialist in criminal law, ECOVIS L + C Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, Landshut, Germany
Dr. Janika Sievert LL.M. Eur., lawyer, tax lawyer, specialist in criminal law, ECOVIS L + C Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, Landshut, Germany
Thomas Hosp LL.M., auditor and tax advisor, ECOVIS Kanzlei Magister Thomas Hosp, Schaan, Liechtenstein
In Germany, a draft law is currently under discussion which provides not only for the reporting obligation for cross-border but also for purely domestic tax arrangements. According to the content of this draft bill, for example, the targeted acquisition of loss-making companies, certain cross-border payments between associated companies, arrangements bypassing the regulations on the automatic exchange of information and also arrangements with legally or economically opaque ownership relationships are defined as transactions subject to reporting requirements.
Tax evasion through the use of letterbox companies
In this respect, further tightening of the legal situation is to be expected, which is in line with, for example, the current criminal sanctioning of the use of so-called letterbox companies. According to Art. 370 of the German Tax Code (Abgabenordnung), anyone who reduces taxes or obtains unjustified tax advantages by using a third country company over which he or she can directly or indirectly exercise a controlling or determining influence, alone or together with related parties, for the purpose of concealing significant tax facts, is punishable by imprisonment for up to 10 years.
Tax distinction for foreign family foundations
A review of investments in what are termed foreign family foundations is again also gaining in importance in this context. Pursuant to Art. 15 of the Foreign Tax Act (Aussensteuergesetz), the assets and income of a family foundation which has its management and registered office outside the Federal Republic of Germany are attributed to the founder or the persons entitled to receive or accumulate income, and are subject to income taxation in Germany (transparent family foundation). Such an allocation of assets and income for tax purposes is only waived if, among other things, it is proven that the founder or the persons entitled to receive or accumulate income (Art. 15 (6) of the Foreign Tax Act - opaque family foundation) are legally and actually deprived of the power to dispose of the foundation’s assets. When using a transparent family foundation, the German tax authorities also regularly assume deliberately punishable conduct, since it must at least be obvious to any taxpayer that the use of such a tax structure may very well have an impact on domestic taxation.
The examination of such family foundations and cross-border arrangements under Liechtenstein law are part of the daily work of ECOVIS colleagues from Liechtenstein and Germany.
Authors:
Alexander Littich LL.M., lawyer, tax lawyer, specialist in criminal law, ECOVIS L + C Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, Landshut, Germany
Dr. Janika Sievert LL.M. Eur., lawyer, tax lawyer, specialist in criminal law, ECOVIS L + C Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, Landshut, Germany
Thomas Hosp LL.M., auditor and tax advisor, ECOVIS Kanzlei Magister Thomas Hosp, Schaan, Liechtenstein
